The O-1 non-immigrant visa is for individuals who possess extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics or who have a demonstrated record of extraordinary achievement in the motion picture or television industry and have been recognized nationally or internationally for those achievements.
The O-1 is a quasi-dual intent visa. Yet, it is not the same as the H-1B or L-1 visa categories, which are truly dual intent. An O-1 applicant must establish the intent to remain temporarily in the United States as a part of the O-1 classification, but the O-1 visa applicant does not need to maintain a residence abroad, which they do not intend to abandon.
The initial period of stay may be granted for three years or less. Extensions of stay may be granted for the time needed to accomplish the event or activity in increments of up to one year.
A U.S. employer, U.S. agent, or foreign employer through a U.S. agent should file Form I-129 petition along with all required evidence.
In support of the O-1 petition, it must be demonstrated that:
Sustained national or international acclaim means that a beneficiary’s acclaim must be maintained over a period of time. There is no definitive timeline on what constitutes a sustained period of time.
No. First, the officer must determine whether the minimum number of criteria has been satisfied. If those requirements are met, the officer must consider all evidence in the record in its totality to determine if the worker is someone of extraordinary ability or achievement.
The O-1 petition must provide a written advisory opinion from a peer group or labor organization or a person with expertise in the O-1 holder’s area of ability. The advisory opinions assist USCIS in assessing the extraordinary talent of the O-1 beneficiary. Consultations are advisory in nature and are not binding on USCIS.
A petitioner must submit a copy of any written contract between the O-1 worker and the petitioner or a summary of the terms of the oral agreement under which the worker will be employed.
An itinerary is not required for all O-1 petitions.
The I-129 extension petition must be received by USCIS no later than the ending validity date on Form I-94.
The O-1 worker must be physically present in the United States at the time the petition is filed. It is not advisable for O-1 employees to travel abroad while a petition is pending.
Yes. If the worker wants to change employers, the new employer must file another O-1 I-129 petition with USCIS.
If there has been any material change, other than the addition of additional performances or engagements requiring someone of extraordinary ability, in the terms and conditions of the worker’s employment or eligibility, an amended I-129 petition must be filed with USCIS. The amendment must be filed before the changes become effective.
Yes. Concurrent O-1 employment allows the individual to work for more than one employer. Each employer will need to have a separate approved O-1 petition.
The O-1 regulations allow for a discretionary grace period of up to 60 consecutive days following the end of O-1 employment or until the end of the authorized validity period shown in the I-94, whichever is shorter. During that time, the O-1 worker must apply for a change of status, file for a change of employer, or depart the country. There is one grace period per authorized stay.
If an O-1 worker is outside the United States, after the O-1 petition has been approved by USCIS, the employee will need to obtain an O-1 visa stamp at the consulate. O-1 visa holders will also need to obtain a valid O1 visa stamp at the consulate in order to re-enter the USA after international travel.
To have your eligibility assessed, please contact Stone Oak Immigration PLLC. A paid consultation will be required.
To set up an initial discussion regarding your legal concerns,
contact us today at 774-284-0329
NIW applicants seek to waive job offer and certification for US benefit
Ashley is an amazing immigration attorney. I referred her all of my immigration clients. She goes above and beyond.
I worked with Ashley for two years at my prior immigration law office and have been in touch with her since. She is a very committed, diligent and capable attorney…